[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: To sid or not to sid?



On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:18:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Jorge Santos <jsf@dep3.fciencias.unam.mx> wrote:
> >I'm thinking on upgrading my work machine to sid, but I need to get
> >*some* work done, so I can't afford too much trouble.  So, has anyone
> >upgraded a potato to sid?  Comments?
....
> The one thing not to do is to get upset at people when things break.
> Breakage, at least to a reasonable extent, goes with the territory in
> unstable.

Agree! One should rather enjoy occasional break down and recovery if one
want sid, I guess.

My suggestion is to do careful upgrade to testing/woody, for Jorge.

If one need something from sid, recompile it from sid source on woody
environment.  After all its work machine and you are asking suggestion
here (If you know very well, I do not think you ask here.)

See my webpage for my memo on upgrade/recovery.

-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ 
+  Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D  +
+  For my debian quick-reference, peek into:                          +
+                               http://www.aokiconsulting.com/quick/  +



Reply to: