Re: what i've learned, and explanation.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:24:42PM -0700, tom@tomd.org wrote:
...
> Anyway, like I said, I think it comes down to that basic question: What
> do you believe? Do you believe everyone is entitled to a free, stable OS
> regardless of their ability to contribute to it, or should Linux always be
> something that is only usable if you have the time and skills necessary?
Read carefully what you wrote. "Having time and skills necessary" and
"being entitled to [whatever] regardless of ability to contribute" is
apples and Mozart. I'll have both, and large fries with that, thanks.
Dima (oh, and "belief" has nothing to do with it)
--
E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswinds dot net (@home)
http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/descript/gpgkey.dmaziuk.ascii -- GnuPG 1.0.4 public key
Well, lusers are technically human. -- Red Drag Diva in ASR
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
- From: "Kevin Stokes" <linux@pieskysoft.com>
- Should dumb, lazy people be encouraged to use Linux?
- From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Should dumb, lazy people be encouraged to use Linux?
- From: will trillich <will@serensoft.com>
- Re: Should dumb, lazy people be encouraged to use Linux?
- From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
- Should arrogant, self-inportant people be encouraged to use Linux?
- Re: Should arrogant, self-inportant people be encouraged to use Linux?
- From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Re: Should arrogant, self-important people be encouraged to use Linux?
- what i've learned, and explanation.
- Re: what i've learned, and explanation.
- From: Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>
- Re: what i've learned, and explanation.