RE: TNT2 and Potato XF86 3.3
Try hooking each card to the monitor directly or reduce your
refresh rate in order to compare the cards. Most switch boxes
will muddy anything above 1024x768x60hz, as will long cable
lengths.
--- Brandon High <armitage@freaks.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>
> > Moreover, it's well supported in X and support nice refresh
> rates at any
> > resolution, my brand new monitor still can't beat this card.
> i'm getting all
> > melancholic here but man take a look at the picture quality
> of the G200
> > compared to a TnT2 (muddy colors)
>
> I have two machines here, one with a TNT2 and one with a G200.
> Both are
> connected to a KVM switch with the same type of video cables.
>
> The TNT2 has a much, much sharper display at 1280x1024 @ 85Hz.
> A co-worker
> upgraded his machine to a GeForce2, and gave me the TNT2. It's
> the same
> model as what's in my other machine. I see no reason why the
> new card would
> perform differently.
>
> I've been a fan of Matrox for 2D ever since the Millenium. (In
> fact, there's
> one of those in another machine here...) I was amazed at the
> relatively poor
> image quality the G200 provides.
>
> -B
>
> --
> Brandon High
> armitage@freaks.com
> I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Reply to: