Re: pyton & perl
- To: debian <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: pyton & perl
- From: "Michael P. Soulier" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:06:05 -0400
- Message-id: <20010401160605.F14156@storm.ca>
- Mail-followup-to: debian <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20010330144526.A3537@animus.fel.iae.nl>; from email@example.com on Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:45:26PM +0200
- References: <20010329101636.C343@hyperion.fis.uerj.br> <20010329103731.F11119@harmony.cs.rit.edu> <3AC3639D.BC146D02@si.urv.es> <20010329143718.D8073@nortelnetworks.com> <20010329231750.A10496@animus.fel.iae.nl> <20010330002146.N15962@storm.ca> <20010330144526.A3537@animus.fel.iae.nl>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:45:26PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:21:46AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> I know people don't like it, that's okee with me, but I don't see how this
> tie's your hands.
Oh, I didn't say this one tied your hands, except for the fact that I find
it more difficult to make my code readable, because I can't just split lines
wherever it's logical to do so.
> Perl allows you to define a var and restrict its use to a single loop
> construct? Indeed a nice feature.
Yup, as does C, C++, Java...
> Personal preferences have a lot to do with what language suits you best.
> And indeed Perl and Python each offer their own set of pecularities that
> easily accounts for people prefering the own over the other.
Certainly. However, I personally find that I like Perl for the same
reasons that I like Unix shells. The syntax might not be simple, or
easy-to-learn, but once you do you're far more productive even thought it
might cost readability for new people.
> Right you are!
> [on the other hand, if everybody was to use Python... ;]
Michael P. Soulier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a
good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be
dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925