on upgrading to testing
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I am not currently subscribing to the list(s). I
am looking for an honest opinion. I currently am a Debian 2.2.r2 (with
several extensions) user. Because of several circumstances among which are:
1) I manually installed Xfree86-4.0.2 over the stable version to get access
to the 3D capabilities--running fine
2) I installed KDE2.1 from Ivan via his potato archives at
kde.tdyc.com--running fine
3) kde.tdyc.com is now gone so Ivan has no where to upgrade that tree for us
stable users--Ivan has gone far and beyond what most people would have put up
with this. I could live with, but for a desire to keep kde 2.1 bug-fixes
current via apt-get.
4) I just found out over the web how to use anti-aliasing fonts under kde 2.1
and I would very much like to do that--neat stuff!!
5) I have everything I need to use the anti-aliasing features except the
potato version of kde2.1 is not compiled to handle it.-- :-( I understand
though!
So, to get what I want, I can either
1) bite the bullet and upgrade to 'testing' and install the kde 2.1 packages
that have anti-aliasing capability compiled in, or
2) try to build the kde 2.1 packages from source like some have done
I really would rather go with option 1. My only concern is the stability,
etc. What has been the experience of those who are now running 'testing' ??
And I will listen. Please e-mail responses directly if possible.
Thanks...
P.S. do I need 'testing' or 'unstable' ? If 'unstable', I will hold.
--
James D. Freels, P.E._i, Ph.D.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
freelsjd@ornl.gov - work
jdfreels@home.com - home
Reply to: