RE: What's up with Mozilla
sorry 'bout the crash statement, i was out of line there, i meant that
mozilla would competely go _down_ if the mailclient went belly up, wich is a
really painfull thing to happen if you're using online documentation wich
you finally dug up
-----Original Message-----
From: ray p [mailto:squadboy@sisna.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 3:38 PM
To: Joris Lambrecht
Subject: Re: What's up with Mozilla
That would be wrong. Maybe a bit on the slow side but more testing will
solve that :) I have never once had the mailclient go south on me yet
alone take down Debian. And I have not used Netscape on purpose since
December.
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> That would be a first, mozilla working great, you must have some heavy
> machinerie. To my humble opinion mozilla is slow and the mailclient can
> crash your entire system. not ? (please say NOT i've been really annoyed
> with the weak-browser thang on linux)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael P. Soulier [mailto:msoulier@storm.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:44 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What's up with Mozilla
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:11:09PM -0800, Aaron Brashears wrote:
>
>> As was said in another reply - packaging mozilla is hard. However,
>> installing the tarball is pretty easy. For now, I'm running 0.8 from
>> the tarball available at mozilla.org and it works great.
>
>
> It's a bit of a pig though, and I had to shut off http 1.1 in the
debug
> network menu to get it to stop sending me to the wrong websites. Hey, I've
> been trying to get it to fire off acroread or xpdf when a pdf is seen, but
> that refuses to work. No idea why. Have you had a problem with this?
>
> Mike
>
Reply to: