Re: weird getlist behaviour
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:05:12AM -0500, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Forgive me if this is either obvious or wrong, but I would assume you're
> looking for:
>
> getlist -h <newsserver> active > foo
>
> since the options (-h <newsserver> active) belong to getlist, not to
> foo.
The > is interpreted by the shell, so it doesn't matter if I put it
before or after... and, no, it doesn't work like that either...
Oh, yeah. Don't CC me please. I'm subscribed.
/Anton
--
A friend is someone who likes you in spite of yourself.
Reply to: