Re: Font corruption under XF86 4.0
Are you using the xfs-xtt font server or the xfs font server? You refer to both. AFAIK only the xfs font server works with version 4 and to use it you do need unix/:7100 in the front of the font paths. X starts with the first line and if it doesn't work, it tries the next line, etc.
--- Daishi Harada <daishi@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
> wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I recently moved from stable to testing, and in the process to XF86
>(4.0.2-1). The problem that I am having is that fonts/text seem to get
>corrupted/not properly refreshed; i.e., when I originally type text
>everything is fine, but if I occlude the text (e.g. with another
>window) and then bring the text window to the foreground the fonts
>become corrupted (the fonts looks like they're missing some
>scanlines). Has anyone encountered with problem/know a solution?
>
>I'm using the neomagic driver (for a Thinkpad 560x). I'm using xfs-xtt
>for my font server, and played with the config there a bit, and am
>pretty sure that's not the issue. Speaking of which, however, does
>anyone know why fonts look worse through xfs? I put the same paths in
>/etc/X11/xfs/config's "catalogue" field as I have in XF86Config's
>FontPath fields, but if I go through xfs (i.e., if I have "unix/:7100"
>listed as the first FontPath) the same fonts look different than when
>I put the "unix/:7100" last.
>
>Please cc me with any replies,
>Thanks, Daishi
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
_____________________________________________________________
Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net
Reply to: