Re: Bug#82710: A version for testing, please.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 07:02:05PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> It is completly pointless to file a bug against a package requesting
> that it go into testing. I thought I'd point this out as I have seen
> several bug reports like this lately. The maintainer of a package has
> little control over whether the package goes into testing.
In that case it was OK since adns was (for some unknown reason) not in
unstable/testing as i had expected. Therefore i did a re-upload.
> So when you filed this bug report on the 17th, adns version 1.0-3 had
> been in unstable for about 10 days and was due to go into testing. Bernd
> uploaded version 1.0-4 the next day (for no good reason). And 1.0-3 was
> moved into testing right in the nick of time before 1.0-4 replaced it in
> unstable.
The good reason was, that adns was not at all in unstable, dont know why. I
dont care if my new upload fixed the problem.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Wendelinusstrasse39.76646Bruchsal.de --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD eckes@irc +497257930613 BE5-RIPE
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Reply to: