Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
From: Brad Burns <bburns@carolina.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:27:27 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010109232727.A13353@carolina.rr.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3.0.5.32.20010110144538.02bde100@mailhost.capmon.com>; from john@capmon.com on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:45:38PM +1100
References: <[🔎] MCEAIHKEKFMILBMCIFOIOEFICBAA.david.shepherd@practiv.com> <[🔎] 3.0.5.32.20010110144538.02bde100@mailhost.capmon.com>

The kernel-image-* packages all seem to be compiled for uniprocessor support.. At this point I just compile the kernel myself (I have an SMP system), but if there are any SMP versions I'm not seeing, could someone point me to them?  Compiling the kernel myself is no big deal, but I'm lazy, and if there's an easier way... :)

> >Can please someone tell me whether 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17'
> >will safely update my kernel from the 2.2.17-compact version to the 'full'
> >version.
> 
> sure you don't want 2.2.18?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
  - From: Frank Rocco <frocco@borg.com>
- Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
  - From: Zach Loafman <zml@zml.net>

References:
- Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
  - From: "David Shepherd" <david.shepherd@practiv.com>
- Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
  - From: John Griffiths <john@capmon.com>

Prev by Date: Re: strange bash feature
Next by Date: Re: More legacy/proprietry app headaches.
Previous by thread: Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
Next by thread: Re: Will 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.17' work OK?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread