on Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 09:24:05AM +0000, john gennard (joney@clara.co.uk) wrote: > On Sunday 03 December 2000 5:23 am, nilly@themail.com wrote: > > ****** Original Message ****** > > FROM: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > SENT: Fri 12/01/2000 11:47 AM > > TO: debian-user-digest@lists.debian.org > > SUBJECT: debian-user-digest Digest V100 #705 > > > > >Content-Type: text/plain > > > > > > > > > > > >debian-user-digest Digest Volume 100 : Issue 705 > > > > > > > > > > > >Today's Topics: > > > > > > Re: OT: nice'ing jobs [ kmself@ix.netcom.com ] > > > > > > Re: Command to determine resolution [ Wayne Topa > > > <wtopa@dmcom.net> ] > > [snip] > > ________________________________________________________________ > > Make A Buck Or Two @ TheMail.com - Free Internet Email > > Sign-up today at http://www.themail.com/ref.htm?ref=1763925 > I have started to receive lots of Digests (with different #xx > numbers). The following is an example showing 'SENT' date > as 12th Jan, 2000 - the others are dated Jan to Mar 2000. > > Can anyone explain why this could be happening. > > John. I've noticed this now three times from nilly@themail.com. I wrote for an explanation the first time it occured. No response. I've added this address to my procmail blacklist. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc. http://www.zelerate.org What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
Attachment:
pgpu6ZOnitMpR.pgp
Description: PGP signature