Re: samba 2.0.7 vs. 2.0.5
On Dec 06 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
> I still use a 2.0.38-kernel (that box is only apt-get upgrade´d, not -
> dist-upgraded, to potato) because of some legacy-software, so for me
> it´s essential that kernel-version-dependencies are correct ;-)
Oh, I see. But I think that I read somewhere that you can make
Samba work fine with 2.0 kernels if you recompile it. So, that
may be a thing that you might try (and I sincerely don't know
what the package maintainer could do in this case, unless he
creates two packages or he includes duplicate binaries and
wrapper scripts).
> I´ve filed a bug-report against samba 2.0.7, so let´s just sit back,
> wait&see.
Well, I've sent Eloy Paris (Debian's Samba maintainer) a
bugreport a looooog time ago (MONTHS ago) and didn't hear back
from him yet. :-(
So, all that I can say is good luck. :-)
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rogerio Brito - rbrito@iname.com - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Reply to: