Re: apt-get strangeness
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> So, apt-get shouldn't be used when something's broken? I used apt-get in
> the first place, so I take it that means that apt-get didn't catch the
> problem. I know the packaging tools are much better than my rpm experiences,
> but I'd love to see these kinds of problems go away.
Er no, this is completely silly. There are no problems that APT does not
Your problem in that APT has interesting way to complain about missing
dependencies. You need to to include more packages on the some install
line and you will be able to figure out what is wrong.