Re: using cvs
Hi,
Thanks for the cvs answers, now I just have to figure out how to compile and make sure there is no dependency problem (which I experienced when first trying to follow the Makefile instructions) More on this might come later, or maybe it's better to contact the gote-admin?
Well in the case of my headers eventually crashing Matus' mailfiltering, I have now removed them. And I must admit that it was a kind of stupid thing to do, I just wanted to learn mutt, and playing around I found a way of creating my own headers. Three of them where lousy, I know. But the fourth, namely:
character-encoding: ISO 8859-1
Seems like a god idea, since we don't all use the same, and I've seen some bizarr guessings on what language some postings are written in. (Maybe this is to no help, maybe I'm just babbling...
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> "Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar" <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> >i set up procmail filter which sends all messages do debian-* lists to
> >special folder.
> >
> >:0
> >* ^Resent-From: .*@lists\.debian\.org
> >lists-debian
> >
> >:0
> >* ^Resent-To: .*@lists\.debian\.org
> >lists-debian
>
> Note that this won't cope with cc'ed or bcc'ed messages. Consider using
> Resent-Sender: or X-Mailing-List: instead.
>
> >Well in THIS case it didn't work... could anybody tell me why doesn't this
> >message contain any of these headers ?
>
> Maybe your mail server and/or procmail got confused by this rubbish
> here:
>
> >-> Lines: 23
> >->
> >-> --------------------: : :---------------------
> >-> ...anarchy.&.love...:
> >=?iso-8859-1?Q?:_:=2E=2E=2Eanarki=2E&=2Ek=E4rlek=2E=2E=2E?=
> >-> ____________________: : :_____________________
> >-> Resent-Message-ID: <RND7RC.A.1pG.lQWD6@murphy>
>
> The blank line just after Lines: seems to suggest that something isn't
> fully RFC822-compliant in its header parsing: as far as I know, '-----'
> or whatever is a legal header name. My mail server (exim), my exim
> filters, and my mail-to-news software handled it just fine. (Although if
> you'd asked me beforehand about whether mailtonews would cope I'd have
> said "umm, not sure" ...)
>
> All the same, Tomas, if your odd mail headers are causing difficulty for
> people then you might want to consider moving that stuff to a .signature
> file or something.
Reply to: