Re: long fsck [was Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")]

To: Nathan E Norman <nnorman@incanus.net>
Cc: Debian Users' Assistance Forum <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: long fsck [was Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")]
From: Jeff Green <jeff@cricinfo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:49:10 +0100
Message-id: <39EE1AD6.D8ADA122@cricinfo.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010171717290.19293-100000@galactica.firetrail.com> <39ECE964.CFD4C8DE@cricinfo.com> <20001018101323.C18017@midco.net>

Nothing, I apologise.

Nathan E Norman wrote:
> What does this have to do with the original topic anyway?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
  - From: "nate@firetrail.com" <nate@firetrail.com>
- Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
  - From: Jeff Green <jeff@cricinfo.com>
- long fsck [was Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")]
  - From: Nathan E Norman <nnorman@incanus.net>