Re: Vim vs Elvis -- was "Mutt's Editor"
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 10:00:15AM -0700, Pann McCuaig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 23:56, will trillich wrote:
> > according to packages.debian.org/vim:
> > stable 18% vim 5.6.070-1 (309.4k)
> > Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
> > according to packages.debian.org/elvis:
> > stable 17% elvis 2.1.4-1 (493k)
> > A much improved "vi" editor with syntax highlighting.
> > elvis's blue suede shoes look more piggish than vim's. nearly
> > by a factor of 2? or is it just docs?
> If you want vim to be really useful you need the vim-rt package as well.
> I suspect that tips the balance.
what's this dependency thing listed for vim-rt? seems odd:
things are more like they used to be than they are now.
email@example.com *** http://www.dontUthink.com/