Re: libc6 -- down to potato?
Andre Berger <email@example.com> writes:
> I made a mistake when I upgraded my xemacs21-nomule from the woody
> packages -- libc6 was replaced on my potato box. Am I damned to use
> woody forever? Seriously, I want the stable version!
Is the system usable? Why not kicking out woody-entrys in sources.list
and manually replacing the woody packages with the ones from potato?
/* Moritz Schulte <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* PGP-Key available, encrypted Mail is welcome.