[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: superformat?



On 14 Sep 2000, John Hasler wrote:

> Michael Soulier writes:
> > Seems it's still two steps, superformat and then mkfs to make an ext2
> > floppy. Just seems a little wierd seeing DOS as the default on a Linux
> > manpage...
> 
> FAT16 is a pretty good format for floppies (that's what it was designed
> for).  Ext2 isn't.

	Yeah, I suppose. Out of curiousity, what format is used on zip
drives running under Linux? I've never used one. Do they have their own
format, ala CDROMS with iso9660?

	I guess floppies aren't all that important in a world of the
internet, but they're still valuable in the form of boot disks, and small
transfers to zero-connectivity machines. Floppies are the only format not
keeping pace it would seem. They've been 1.4M for how long now, while
harddrives go from 500M -> 13Gig standard? 

	I just needed it tonight to set up a laptop that's not connected
to anything. Those disks may not hold much, but it's amazing how essential
a small file like an XF86Config file downloaded from the internet can be. 

	Mike

"To listen to the words of the learned, and to instill into others the
lessons of science, is better than religious exercises."
		-- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) 



Reply to: