Re: apt-get pkg held-back?
Indeed this was the case Bob. Thanks for the heads up. It wanted a
jx-lib installed before it would upgrade code-crusader. Is this a common
occurance that a package will say it's being held back because a 'new'
dependency exists that didn't before in the previous edition?
Regards, Bill
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 08:41:09PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Try 'apt-get dist-upgrade' instead. The "kept-back" message probably
> relates to a new dependency.
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:48:39PM -0500, William Jensen wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I did a apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and saw the following:
> >
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following packages have been kept back
> > code-crusader
> > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> >
> > Why would a package be "kept back"? Does this mean there is a new rev but
> > the author hasn't quite finished putting the package up?
>
> --
> Bob Nielsen, N7XY nielsen@oz.net
> Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.oz.net/~nielsen
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: