[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Current correct woody URL's for apt-get?



At 07:53 PM 9/6/2000 -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
>repeated 'apt-get upgrade's over time will leave you following the
>"woody" distribution, even after it becomes frozen and eventually
>stable.  If you change it to "unstable", you will always track the
>release that is considered "unstable"; this will be a different
>release with some as-of-yet undetermined name when woody freezes.


But won't you need to do a dist-upgrade when the as-yet-unamed next unstable comes out? so isn't it better to keep going on the dist name? and keep track of developments?

WARNING - 
This email is confidential and may contain copyright material. 
If you are not the intended recipient of Capital Monitor's original e-mail,
please notify me by return e-mail, delete your copy of the message, and
accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.
Republication or re-dissemination, including posting to news groups or web
pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Capital
Monitor Pty Ltd.  

____________________________________________________________

John Griffiths			Tel 02 6273 4899
Capital Monitor Pty Ltd		Fax 02 6273 4905
Press Gallery 			Mobile: 0412 690 643
Parliament House		e-mail: john@capmon.com
Canberra   ACT   2600		http://www.capmon.com
Australia			ICQ No: 7933859



Reply to: