On 2 Aug 2000, John Hasler wrote:
> Paul Seelig writes:
> > This functionality is given by the "apropos(1)" command. "man man" still
> > describes "man -k" though. I guess this counts as a bug...
>
> Why? 'man -k' works fine.
>
You are right, i had an alias "man -P less" for man which resulted in a
not working "man -k". Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers, P. *8^)