[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Man -K

On 2 Aug 2000, John Hasler wrote:

> Paul Seelig writes:
> > This functionality is given by the "apropos(1)" command. "man man" still
> > describes "man -k" though. I guess this counts as a bug...
> Why?  'man -k' works fine.
You are right, i had an alias "man -P less" for man which resulted in a
not working "man -k".  Sorry for the confusion.

                                Cheers, P. *8^)

Reply to: