Re: udf kernel patch

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: udf kernel patch
From: Chanop Silpa-Anan <chanop@syseng.anu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 19:05:07 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000516190507.A31048@dynax.anu.edu.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000516011155.D8939@theo.namodn.com>; from robert@namodn.com on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 01:11:55AM -0700
References: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.3.90.1000516095554.26836A-100000@fatima.dds.nl> <[🔎] 20000516011155.D8939@theo.namodn.com>

Once upon a time, I heard Rob say

> Hmm.. I have one for 2.2.14, one of the reasons I don't just
> go up to .15 ... also a reiserfs patch..
> 
I have been using 2.2.14 reiser patch on 2.2.15 since pre10, for about 2-3
months now, the patch applied cleanly and I haven't found a problem yet.

--
Chanop

Attachment: pgpIAOckj54J0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: udf kernel patch
  - From: Kristian Rink <Kristian.Rink@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>

References:
- udf kernel patch
  - From: Gijs van der Brugge <dp@dds.nl>
- Re: udf kernel patch
  - From: Rob <robert@namodn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: udf kernel patch
Next by Date: Is Storm based on potato or slink ?
Previous by thread: Re: udf kernel patch
Next by thread: Re: udf kernel patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread