Re: Signal 11?
Felix Natter (fnatter@gmx.net) wrote:
> "Colin Boyd" <colin_boyd@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > I wrote in the other day detailing the overwhelming amount of erradic
> > behaviour my new system (K62-550,128MB,16M Vid)
<SNIP>
> this is most probably not a compiler problem.
> When I tried to overclock a Celeron 300A, I also had these problems -
> only when compiling. It seems that gcc is "exercising" the system the most.
I agree. I've seen very strange results from overclocking. Just for fun
try UNDERclocking the processor. This *shouldn't* cause any damage, but
YMMV. Should it pass after doing this, you may have a remarked
processor...
JMHO,
Ron
--
Email: <mailto:rbf@farrer.net>
Home: <http://www.farrer.net>
Bellingham Linux Users Group: <http://www.blug.org>
Alpha Linux Orginization: <http://www.alphalinux.org>
Reply to: