[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

esound, lesstif, debian issues



Hi.

First of all, it is quite interesting that I didn't get a single reply on
my question about the esound dependency problems. Am I he only one who
would like to use Gnome and Alsa at the same time under Potato? :)
Well, anyway.

The other thing... I downloaded the "Fractint for motif" (Xmfract)
software in source code. It is not a Linux program, but one written for
generic Unix systems with Motif. I compiled it with the Lesstif libraries,
everything went fine until I started the installed binary from X. It was
S.L.O.W. in the "Winblows 98 on a 386 with 4 Megs RAM" kind of meaning of
the word (not the fractal generation, but when I open a new options
window, or do something window-manager related), and complained
constantly about not being able to allocate colors. I thought this more
than weird, as I was using 32 bit colors... ;) And lo, it really couldnt
allocate color maps, all the fractals came out as variations for "deep
blue lines on a big black background". It does work normally under mwm
with 8 bit colors, but it is still slow, and the positioning inside 
windows seems a bit "warped", like texts covering each other and so on.
Is this because Lesstif is still not 100% compatible with the real thing,
or could the problem lie somewhere else (like a version bug or something)?

And about Debian...
Well, I don't say it is the best Linux out there, but I like it the
most. ;) Mainly because it is simple, and can easily be kept in hand. I
get the cold shivers from those "user-friendly" Linuxes like Caldera or
SUSE... They are very user-friendly until you actually try to use
them. :)
By installing and configuring Debian stone-by-stone, you get to know your
system inside-out. I was a complete M$-addict until a year ago, and all my
experiments with various Linuxes (RedHat, SUSE) were total failures. But
by installing a working debian system, I sort of learned the necessary
things in-flight.

Daniel Szabo


Reply to: