Re: (not)lame batch job
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Hans wrote:
> I've been comparing (not)lame313 and bladeenc today and (not)lame does
> sound equally good at 128 compared to bladeenc at 256 bitrate. I use The
> Who's 'Won't Get Fooled Again' for comparison, if you wonder.
>
> What I can't get done with (not)lame is batch jobs. Bladeenc simply names
> the mp3 after the original file, changing wav to mp3. You can type
> $bladeenc *.wav and all the wav files in the directory get encoded. How can
> you do this with (not)lame, as it requires both input and output name? --hans
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
I'm using cdenc
----- snip -------
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# Creation of whole mp3 Suite of one CD
#
# Version 0.3.5 of 06.07.1999 by Stephan Skrodzki
#
---- snip ---------
with little changes with lame or gogo.
a very easy way to create *.mp3 from complete CD with playlist and html
index.
lucky day
Peter
Reply to: