[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is the Jan 27 version of Packages.gz for potato/main safe?



On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 10:43:56PM -0800, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> I've been upgrading my potato installation about every day for months,
> and usually only a few packages get upgraded.  But earlier today, I
> started my usual upgrade process, and pulled down the latest
> Packages.gz file for potato/main, and (I use dselect) noticed that
> many (thirty or more?) of my installed packages were now marked for
> removal.  I was afraid to continue with the process, so I didn't ask
> dselect to do the installation.
> 
> Is there something actually wrong with that Packages file, or am I
> just being paranoid?

The problem is twofold. First, libc6-bin has been folded into libc6,
which will remove netscape-base-4 (and the rest that all depend on that)
and w3c. The larger part of the problem is that xscreensaver mistakenly
depends on perl instead of perl5, which causes perl-5.005 to be removed,
which kills many other things.

The best solution for the moment is to put libc6, libc6-dev, locales,
and xscreensaver on hold until it's all worked out.


-- 
  finger for GPG public key.
  8 Jan 2000 - Old email addresses removed from key, new added

Attachment: pgprgUMQiSSp8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: