I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?

To: <Debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?
From: "Bart Szyszka" <bart@gigabee.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 12:26:43 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 001d01bf4d6a$e2c819e0$dcfe5c18@twcny.rr.com>

Hi,

I just thought of something. I thought the whole reason why KDE wasn't
included in the Debian download trees because of the licensing issues
with QT. If that's the case, then why is QT included in the download tree?!?
If QT is OK to put in there then what's the point of saying KDE can't be
there?

-- 
Bart Szyszka bart@gigabee.com ICQ:4982727
B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com
Join AllAdvantage.com and get paid to surf the Web!
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=ARD582

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?
  - From: Brian Servis <servis@purdue.edu>
- Re: I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?
  - From: "Eric Gillespie, Jr." <epg@pobox.com>
- Re: I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?
  - From: <carlf@panix.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Can someone answer this? (qt1g problem)
Next by Date: Re: I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?
Previous by thread: Date's and info...
Next by thread: Re: I thought KDE wasn't included because of QT?!?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread