Re: lo on potato
For me eth0 route seems to be set automatically by the kernel, but not
lo. I'm using kernel 2.2.12.
Marcin Kurc writes:
> kernel 2.2.x does "route add -net" automatically. You dont need to specify it.
> The route can be changed by giving full syntax like you said.
>
> -> /usr/src/linux/Documentation
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 12:33:57AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Yes,
> >
> > I had the same problem. The solution was to add netmask to the route
> > command in /etc/init.d/network:
> > /sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo
> >
> > Also netmask had to be added to my eth0 interface:
> > /sbin/route add -net 192.168.x.y netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
> >
> > Maybe the new version of route is more picky regarding syntax?
> >
> > However, correcting the eth0 entry resulted in TWO eth0-entries!! I don't
> > know where the other one is set up. Anybody has a clue??
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > svante.signell@telia.com
> >
> > Evan Moore writes:
> > > i have potato running on two boxes, but the lo interface will not come up,
> > > it complains about SIOCADDRT: invalid argument ?? The error is not showing
> > > up in syslog. Any1 else have this prob?
> > >
> > > thanks evan
> > >
>
> --
> Marcin Kurc
> Indiana Institute of Technology
> System Administrator
> http://me.indtech.edu http://www.indtech.edu
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: