Re: lo on potato
I had the same problem. The solution was to add netmask to the route
command in /etc/init.d/network:
/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo
Also netmask had to be added to my eth0 interface:
/sbin/route add -net 192.168.x.y netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
Maybe the new version of route is more picky regarding syntax?
However, correcting the eth0 entry resulted in TWO eth0-entries!! I don't
know where the other one is set up. Anybody has a clue??
Evan Moore writes:
> i have potato running on two boxes, but the lo interface will not come up,
> it complains about SIOCADDRT: invalid argument ?? The error is not showing
> up in syslog. Any1 else have this prob?
> thanks evan
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe email@example.com < /dev/null
- lo on potato
- From: Evan Moore <firstname.lastname@example.org>