Re: Kernel 2.2 on Slink == possible && safe?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2 on Slink == possible && safe?
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: 24 Nov 1999 20:28:30 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 84vh6snsqp.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
In-reply-to: andreas@aci.se's message of "24 Nov 99 09:21:28 GMT"
References: <[🔎] 383B9D30.146DF37E@aci.se> <[🔎] 383BAE18.DA4A4ED3@aci.se>

>>>>> "andreas" == andreas pålsson <andreas@aci.se> writes:

    andreas> The other option is to run Potato, since I just need the
    andreas> base and enough tools to compile the 2.2 kernel.  But
    andreas> this system _must_ be stable and I fear Potato ain't
    andreas> really there yet.

My computer is fully slink, and I use the 2.2 kernel. I have never
noticed any problems yet.

In addition, if you really find you need a potato package, you might
be able to recompile it for slink.
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

References:
- Kernel 2.2 on Slink == possible && safe?
  - From: andreas pålsson <andreas@aci.se>
- Re: Kernel 2.2 on Slink == possible && safe?
  - From: andreas pålsson <andreas@aci.se>

Prev by Date: Re: quickie.
Next by Date: Kernel
Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.2 on Slink == possible && safe?
Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.2 on Slink == possible && safe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread