Re: Help!!! - Potato upgrade using dselect trashed computer...
Ok, I modified the file as you show below.
Did you notice that there was a file named other.dpkg-dist that had the following in it?
Not sure if this is important or not.
auth required pam_unix.so
account required pam_unix.so
password required pam_unix.so
session required pam_unix.so
What should I do after this? I am afraid to reboot and not be able to log in ever again...
I have attacked the output from dpkg -l | grep libpam
Thanks again,
Doug
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 08:51:47AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> > Ok Ben, here they are.
> >
> > One other thing to note: During the install I had a message with "modutils" stating
> > that The form:
> > Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10 was replaced with the form:
> > Patch[fs]=/lib/modules/2.2.10/fs
> >
> > I could not find where to change thi. I did find a file called conf.modules.old that
> > had command lines like those described above. Could this be causing a problem with
> > pam?
>
> No, completely unrelated.
>
> > OTHER auth required pam_deny.so
> > OTHER account required pam_deny.so
> > OTHER password required pam_deny.so
> > OTHER session required pam_deny.so
>
> Here's the problem, not sure where the settings in this file came from.
> The distributed other looks like this:
>
> ##########
> #
> # /etc/pam.d/other - specify the PAM fallback behaviour
> #
> # We fall back to the standard UNIX access. If this is not secure enough
> # for your purpose, consider specifying pam_deny.so instead.
> #
> auth required pam_unix_auth.so
> account required pam_unix_acct.so
> password required pam_unix_passwd.so
> session required pam_unix_session.so
> ##########
>
> Change /etc/pam.d/other to look like this. Also, run this and see what
> versions of the PAM libraries you have installed:
>
> dpkg -l | grep libpam
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
ii libpam-modules 0.70-2 Pluggable Authentication Modules for PAM
ii libpam-runtime 0.70-2 Runtime support for the PAM library
ii libpam0g 0.70-2 Pluggable Authentication Modules library
Reply to: