Re: Netscape and its cache

[iehrenwald@earthlink.net]

> So, is there a viable alternative? I tried Mosaic, but it lacks some
> important features. I use lynx quite often, but it's only good when
> one wants to read some text pages. Emacs/W3 eats memory like crasy,
> and is slow and lacks features even more...

Heh.  Nope.  No alternative.  You learn to live with it.  Untill Mozilla
is done, that is.  Hopefully Mozilla will be good.  I was playing with
Mozilla M10 a few days ago and was very impressed.  It still crashed often
and didn't handle somethings right but it was a giant step in the right
direction.

		--Ian Ehrenwald