Re: Latest Wine effectively broken?
the latest wine is broken anyway for me at least. i just had to recompile
the older one from august to get cdrwin to work properly. kept getting
MSVCRT20.DLL errors and it crashed whenever i tried to open a 'browse'
dialog box. recompiled the latest today and it still puked on me, went to
the build from august and it works fine. burning a cd in cdrwin right now
actually.
damn i love linux.
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Linux System Administrator http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> After upgrading my box with apt-get I find that WINE no longer works.
> Apparently apt-get allowed it to be fetched but the install could not
> follow through because a file it depends on, libgl1 was not available.
> The version of WINE to which I refer is wine 0.0.990923-1
>
> I note from the Debian web site that it depends on:
>
> libgl1 (NOT AVAILABLE)
> GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone data
>
> How on earth has this happened? Surely apt is cleverer than this?
> Because I (stupidly) cleared out my apt archives I no longer had a
> previous version to fall back on. I have since managed to find the older
> version.
>
> Any idea how this can happen? Surely if a file depends on another file,
> and that other file is not available, apt would not attempt to fetch and
> install it?
>
>
> --
> Phillip Deackes
> Debian Linux (Potato)
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: