[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: uploads over modem are SLOOOOOW!



I have seen this before on my machine, but it has been a couple of months ago. 
I have no idea what I did to make the problems go away.  I had it in Windows
98 as well, but with Windows that is understandable.  It was only with mail
that I had it -- downloading normal stuff as well.

On 20-Aug-99 Greg Baker wrote:
>> I connect via dial-up with a usual connect of 50666/ARQ/V90/LAPM/V42BIS.
>> When I send a large email with attachments or upload a file it is VERY
>> SLOW.  Watching the traffic on something like pppload or wmppp show
>> only short bursts of intermintent traffic, often there is a 5-7 second
>> pause between the upload bursts.  I don't have any problems with
>> dowloads.  I don't set mtu or mru in the ppp config files, after the
>> link is up ifconfig shows that mtu is set at 1500.  My latest upload
>> test via ftp gave '725473 bytes sent in 1187.13 secs (0.6 kB/s)' and a
>> download test gave '725473 bytes received in 133.82 secs (5.3 kB/s)'.
>> That's a factor of 8.87 speed difference between download and upload!
>> 
>> Do I have to live with this or do I have something configured wrong.
>> I am running kernel 2.2.11 and ppp 2.3.7-3.
> 
> I've observed the same thing with a variety of different configurations.
> I always blamed it on some inherent inefficieny in SMTP or sendmail or
> something.
> 
> That probably isn't the case, though.  SMTP should be no more inefficient
> that HTTP--the data transmission happens in more-or-less the same way. It
> probably isn't sendmail's fault either since I've seen it with sendmail,
> smail and exim at various ends of the connection. 
> 
> Maybe the SMTP servers at our respective ISPs are under heavy load?
> 
> Sorry I haven't helped much, but you're at least not alone.
> 
> Greg
> 

/---------------------------
| Wim Kerkhoff              
| wim@netmaster.ca
| www.canadianhomes.net/wim 
| ICQ: 23284586


Reply to: