[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: which pgp package?



Thus wrote Steve Gore (sgore@ev1.net) [99.08.17 21:03]:
> > > I'm new to pgp. It seems that there are many pgp packages in potato,
> > > ie pgp-us, pgp-i, pgp5i. Which one I should use?
> > 
> > Personally, I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GPG): http://www.gnupg.org
> > It's currently in beta - what isn't in the Linux world :), with 1.0 due
> > out next month. It works quite well, especially with Mutt. Though it
> > seems the potato Mutt doesn't have gpg support, so I had to compile that
> > myself. Oh well...
> > 
> ---end quoted text---
> 
> (Hrmm.. testing 1 2 3...)
> 
> My Mutt seems to be supporting GPG.  I'm using the most recent binaries
> straight from potato.
> 
> Please advise me if I'm mistaken. (I'm new to pgp/gpg also.)

Maybe I just did something wrong, that sort of thing happens often :)
At any rate, Mutt 0.95.7/0.95.7i was just released, so I'll try that
when it hits potato.

-- 
-- Chris Gushue --------- ICQ:409207 --------- seymour@iname.com --
GCS d- s+:- a23 C++>$ UL+++ P+>++ L+++ E---- W++ N++ o-- K- w--- O-
M-- V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+ t++ 5+ X++ R- tv+ b++ DI+ D+ G++ e h! r y+
-- http://seymour.napalm.net ----------- http://owirc.napalm.net --

Attachment: pgpQ7qTk03wlo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: