Re: WARNING: APT removes bash on slink upgrade
Jason writes:
> Apparently it is usable enough to startup and run scripts. What you might
> be able to get away with is to put a normal Depends: librealine on bash -
> but I am not sure.
> Probably the best answer is that bash should not require bash to install
> itself!
A while back I had a library wreck that hosed up bash: I got out of it by
linking sh to ash. Maybe bash needs to depend on ash :)
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: