Debian hierarchy : changing it
I think the Debian hierarchy is very out of date and unappropriated.
1 ) I'm not sure but I think the content of non-free should be splited :
there should be a non-free which is non-free because of non-free features :
e.g. : converting to gif. These software could be moved to a new section,
couldn't they ? All these software must accept being freely redistributed.
and a non-free section because of restriction in redistribution, use...
2 ) The spliting (admin, devel,x11...) is too old. There is too many
software in each of these categories. I think we should allow making
subdirectories like
admin/pkg
admin/users
net/mua
net/mta
...
3 ) the base section would be a special section where there would be a
majority of symlinks...
4 ) ALL The docs should be located in the docs/ section (e.g. apache-doc
and a lot of other are not, so it's not logic)
So,
- It will be easier to find all the programs which are for a common task : e.g.
managing users, packages, reading/sending mail, ...
- The archives grows days after days and it will be soon unusable if there
is 3 or 4 hundreds packages in the same dir.
- It's cleaner : ALl the packages would be in their section and we won't
say : I think it's a base package, so I will seach it in the base
section...
- It's more efficient : When we don't know exactly what we want to do but
want for example managing users, we won't have to search keywords that
are appropriate or typing dpkg --info on all packages to see what they
are doing.
If you think it's a good idea, I fell ready to make a new hierarchy and a
policy.
--
// -----oOo----- ---------oOo-------- -------oOo------\\
| Sami Dalouche | samid@ifrance.com | AIM : linhax |
| 01.34.83.16.76 | linhax@ifrance.com | ICQ : 25529539 |
\\ -----oOo----- ---------oOo-------- -------oOo------//
Reply to: