Re: A better telnet?
You might want to check out cygwin, at
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin.
The price is right (free, actually open source). It's a
fairly complete Unix emulation layer that runs on NT & 95.
It has a "real" command line telnet that works as it should.
There is also a telnetd, in case you want to go the other
direction.
I can't remmember if this is part of the base distribution, but
if it isn't you can find it pretty easily by following the links
to ported software.
Rich
Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
>
> On 8 Jun 99, at 12:44, Mark Wright wrote:
>
> > I often need to telnet from my NT box to my Debian server. Of course, this
> > means I lose everything from Vim syntax highlighting to sensible Delete and
> > Backspace key mappings. What I really want is the equivalent of the Linux
> > console, but remotely from a Win32 machine. Does such a thing exist?
>
> Download QVT/Term at http://www.tucows.com. It´s better than
> Micro$oft Telnet.
>
> []´s
>
> Adilson
>
> |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |Adilson dos Santos Dantas - Rio de Janeiro - Brasil |
> |e-mail: adilsond@lci.ufrj.br adilson@dinos.darkover.org |
> | adilsond@rio.nutecnet.com.br adilson_dantas@geocities.com |
> |URL: http://www.lci.ufrj.br/~adilsond ICQ UIN# : 4542346 |
> | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/7479 |
> |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
> Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Reply to: