Re: mail clients
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 23:45:39 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator?
Then that wouldn't be a single application, would it?
>It sounds to me like you've become so attached to this particular piece of
>software that you believe that you can't work any other way.
Oh, I know I can. But not as efficiently.
>Don't yell, I'm not responsible for your problems.
That wasn't yelling, that was emphasis for a point I knew you would miss.
You are, in part, responisble for my problems. You are part of the crowd that
keeps harping that *your* way is *the* way to the exclusion of all others.
>In the past, Linux users faced with a problem have programmed around it.
>Thus, we have a dozen different window managers and a dozen different mail
>clients. But, now, we are faced with a new group of users that whine all day
>long, but don't lift a finger to solve the problem. What a shame!
New? I addressed that in the last message. I also addressed that I
cannot program. Most people can't you know. I've also pointed out that I am
not opposed to paying for others to program something I would like. That is
why I have an offer up on the Software Bazaar and when that one is fulfilled
I'll pay for more *OPEN SOURCE* development.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN0eMpHpf7K2LbpnFEQJnmgCeLzjICSRac1z/1cW04TYl+GGWG04Aniau
Q2UcRq063dsKbvVNFqwRxPWC
=bTER
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: