>> "DM" == Damon Muller <damon@empire.net.au> writes: DM> Is this a bug with either of the packages? If so, which one? xdm DM> and wdm seem to co-exist well as regards to things like depends. The thing is, that you could manage :0 with xdm, :1 with wdm and XDMCP with gdm or such. So the packages don't conflict in a traditional sense. But looks like all of them try to manage :0 and therefore there is this mess. Ciao, Martin