Re: deb vs. rpm
No, RPM has nothing like APT. If you have any dependency problems,
misconfigured packages, etc, one "apt-get -f install" will fix it. I
can set up an /etc/apt/sources.list file that points to two different
FTP sites and APT will automagically download any package I tell it to
and all of the dependencies. Want to upgrade to the latest stuff
in unstable? Just run "apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade". FTP
installation/update with RedHat is a pain, probably b/c their main
economic goal is to sell more CDs. Personally, I've been using Debian
for several years and have never bought a CD. I've gone from waiting
4 hours on a 64K ISDN line to waiting about 30 minutes on a 10MB cable
modem.
--
Stephen Pitts
smpitts@midsouth.rr.com
webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: deb vs. rpm
- From: "Thorsten Manegold" <Thorsten.Manegold@stud.uni-regensburg.de>
- References:
- deb vs. rpm
- From: "Thorsten Manegold" <Thorsten.Manegold@stud.uni-regensburg.de>
- Re: deb vs. rpm
- From: Paul Nathan Puri <publisher@ompages.com>
- Re: deb vs. rpm
- From: "Thorsten Manegold" <Thorsten.Manegold@stud.uni-regensburg.de>