[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

re: new install: network unreachable



Hi csani,
You're a genius!....  the ipfwadm -Mf command was rejected, but the
others worked and now I'm back on the net! Can you please explain a
little what was going on and why my config defaulted to
allow_no_network_traffic_mode?

What's the best way to permanently set the correct options?

Many thanks,
Chris.

On  6 Apr 99 at 16:35, Holanyi Janos, jr. wrote:
> Just wondering... try these commands:
> (for a 2.0 kernel)
> 
> ipfwadm -If
> ipfwadm -Of
> ipfwadm -Ff
> ipfwadm -Mf
> ipfwadm -I -p acc
> ipfwadm -O -p acc
> ipfwadm -F -p acc
> ipfwadm -F -p acc
> 
> ...and ping. Is it better?
> 
> Bye
> csani
> 
> On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Chris Brown wrote:
> 
> > Brant & others.....   getting desperate here, please help!
> > 
> > To answer your question, I'm not sure *EXACTLY* how to check if the 
> > PCMCIA packages are installed, but I believe the answer is yes.
> > 
> > If I look at top, I can see cardmgr running. If I insert/remove the 
> > 3c589 I hear the tell-tale hot-swap beeps, and when the system boots 
> > or the card is inserted, the network active light comes on on the 
> > adapter at the appropiate times.
> > 
> > Also, a ping of the machine's own address completes properly in a 
> > millisecond or two. If I remove the card, pinging its own address 
> > returns the message "network is unreachable". Pings to any other 
> > address with the card in result in:
> >  ping: sendto: operation not permitted
> >  ping: wrote 207......  64 chars, ret=-1
> >  
> > 
> > I had a linux_guru_friend stop by last night to look at the problem, 
> > he looked at some low level tcpip functionality and saw that arp 
> > requests were being received by the laptop, but is wasn't sending 
> > anything out on the network. After mucking with it for a few hours he 
> > thought he would try a re-install from the rescue disks..... same 
> > result! We successfully installed debian via nfs over the *EXACT* 
> > same network and interface, then on rebooting the network doesn't 
> > work and ping returns "operation not allowed"
> > 
> > Any suggestions please !!!!!!
> > 
> > On  5 Apr 99 at 22:42, Brant Wells wrote:
> > > 
> > > Have you checked to make sure that the latptop PCMCIA packages are
> > > installed?
> > > 
> > > Just checking,
> > > 
> > > Brant.
> > > 
> > > Chris Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Please help, this is a newbie being stupid question....
> > > >
> > > > I've done several slink installs that have worked fine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to install it on my laptop now and am having problems
> > > > with the system once its installed. Basically everything seems
> > > > fine but I can't use the network (3c589 pcmcia ethernet). I can ping
> > > > the machine's own address but pings anywhere else result with ping
> > > > declaring "not allowed"...
> > > >
> > > > My ifconfig and route table look fine. I know the driver and network
> > > > is okay because the entire system was nfs installed initially! This
> > > > problem occurs when I reboot after completing the entire install
> > > > process.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect that I've (unknowingly) installed some sort of ip security
> > > > program that is not allowing network access, I see things in the boot
> > > > log like "ip paranoia deamon"... and others that I don't understand. I
> > > > used the custom package selection of dinstall. I've carefully done
> > > > the process twice with the same results.
> > > >
> > > > As a newbie, I have no idea how to search the OS to find the
> > > > offending software if that's the problem.
> > > >
> > > > Besides any suggestions on what might be causing this problem, can
> > > > someone please let me know how I'd (efficiently) go about tracking
> > > > down offending software in general?
> > 



 *********************************************************************
 Chris Brown       cbrown@seitz.com         !!! HELP FIGHT SPAM !!!

 Join; www.cauce.org  See; spam.abuse.net, spamsucks.com, www.cm.org
 ****************************************************************
 


Reply to: