Re: Smail -> Exim: If smail works, why change?
On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Frederick Page wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 1999 at 11:54:31AM -0500, Jim Foltz wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> >Is there any compelling reason to switch from smail to exim?
>
The current upstream maintainer of smail has stated that development of it
is done. There will be no more major work in it. He will maintain the code
as people migrate to other MTA's. Exim is derived from smail3 and has a
familliar configuration concept. THe main difference being that Exim uses
one config file for its routers, directors, and main config rather than
individual files.
Reply to: