[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE 1.1 don´t install under hamm



Actually, they've fixed the packages today (version 2 now).
Just installed. Seems to be OK, except that the kdm startup script is
incompatible with slink (it wants the start-kdm line /etc/X11/options
file, which is absent in slink). So I've copied from xdm and modified it.

Sergey.

On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Stephen Pitts wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 12:33:47PM -0400, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> > Hi friends!
> > 
> >          This is the first time I write here. Sorry for it is a problem that
> > bring me to write this one, but... Debian life is Debian life...
> >          I?ve installed Debian 2.0 about a month ago, and I love it. It is
> > very much better than Slackware that I ran before, or RH that I tried before
> > Debian.
> >           I?ve installed Gnome (0.30) which I get from ftp.gnome.org in .deb
> > format. It worked great, but it was not KDE (which I love), so I decided to
> > install KDE.
> >          I downloaded KDE 1.1 from ftp.varesearch.com which I get in .deb
> > format too. When trying to install (dpkg -i kdelibs2g_1......) it returns a
> > message that sounds like "subprocess: gzip -dc: it isn?t in gzip format" or
> > something like that, and quit.
> >          Can someone help me?
> > 
> >          []s, TIA
> > 
> >                                            Pablo Lorenzzoni
> > 
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
> > 
> > -- 
> > Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> > 
> Same problem happened to me. I downloaded it from ftp.varesearch.com and ftp.kde.org. The MD5 sums computed OK too. Searching through the kde mailing list archives, I saw one other person with the same error message. Perhaps someone who is 'in the know' about KDE in .deb format could reply?
> -- 
> Stephen Pitts
> smpitts@midsouth.rr.com
> webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
> 


Reply to: