Re: [SOLVED] Re: Kernel 2.2.1: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument ?
*- On 9 Feb, Ed Cogburn wrote about "[SOLVED] Re: Kernel 2.2.1: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument ?"
> "Ralf G. R. Bergs" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 1999 15:02:36 -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>>
>> > route add -net 127.0.0.0
>> >
>> > Its the route command thats generating the "SIOCADDRT: Invalid
>> >argument". I'm up to date with potato, (I got the kernel deb from
>> >there) so what could this be?
>>
>> The kernel automatically sets the route to the interface. Remove the above line,
>> and all will be well again. :-)
>>
>
>
> Ralf was right. The 'route' command (/etc/init.d/network) is
> apparently no longer necessary with kernel 2.2.1. Just remove
> it. After reboot, 'ifconfig' shows loopback up and running.
>
> Thanks Ralf, and to servis for responding.
>
>
Yeah, I read that in the Changes file in the kernel source but when I
removed the route lines for my network card I had Samba problems.
Mainly my Win95 clients couldn't connect at all. As soon as I put the
route statements back in everything was working(by the way I do not get
any SIOCADDRT errors). However, I am running slink with Samba
1.9.18p10-7. Maybe Samba has to be recompiled against the new kernel
headers.
--
Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,
because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes."
- unknown
Mechanical Engineering bservis@usa.net
Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: