Re: debian-user trailer line: incomprehensible to those who need it
- To: Noel Yap <ivy1@cornell.edu>
- Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debian-user trailer line: incomprehensible to those who need it
- From: Kirk Hogenson <Kirk.Hogenson@wingra.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 15:20:11 -0600
- Message-id: <"36B61A8B.A1A61A29"@wingra.com>
- References: <"36B60F6C.A35578B8"@medicine.adelaide.edu.au>, <"36B61302.7C982CA7"@bdsinc.com>, <"14006.5270.597605.268892"@ascus.cit.cornell.edu>
Immanuel Yap wrote:
>
> Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
>
> > So, shall we take this opportunity to reopen the discussion about
> > the debian-user trailer line? The evidence just keeps indicating
> > that the existing one is useless to those who could benefit from it
> > and ignored by everyone else.
>
> I agree. If you know enough to translate that cryptic statement, you
> would certainly know enough not to send the unsubscribe message to the
> list.
It looks like he did send it to debian-user-request.
But, he left the subject as "(no subject)". The Netscape mailer brings
up a dialog "You haven't put a subject..." when you try to send
a subjectless message, and defaults to (no subject) -- you have to
delete that to get a message w/o a subject.
It seems that debian-user-request forwards messages with subjects
to debian-user. Is that true?
Can the list processor at debian-user-request handle the extra
"mail -s" and "< /dev/null" text on the line, and still process
the "unsubscribe ..." part? If so, he may have sucessfully been
unsubscribed.
Kirk
Reply to: