Testers for xisp prerelease wanted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
there is a new version of xisp underway (X frontend to pppd). The
autor is looking for testers, especially for the varous authentication
methods he can't test himself. Available methods are:
+------------------------+-------------------+
| dial-in phase | call-back phase |
| login method | login method |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| scripted | - |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| scripted | scripted |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| scripted | manual |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| manual | - |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| manual | scripted |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| manual | manual |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| authenticated | - |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| authenticated | authenticated |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| manual-authenticated | - |
+------------------------+-------------------+
| manual-authenticated | authenticated |
+------------------------+-------------------+
So if you want to help, install
ftp://134.95.210.54/pub/debian/xisp/xisp_2.6-0.1_i386.deb
and report back to me ( xisp@packages.debian.org ) and the author
Dimitrios P. Bouras <dbouras@hol.gr>.
Make a copy of ~/.xisprc (just to be on the save side).
Also feedback from someone running 2.2.0-pre9 is appreciated.
Thank you.
Martin
PS: I signed this message, so you can be sure this is noone trying to
spread a trojan. Check my key with the one available in the
debian-keyring (you may have to update the keyring to the one
available in slink/potato).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBNqu1fnzgxeT40EqFAQGj0gQAosHbZqQ6ZjkTMW7P0EvKtzUsHKUgEOEW
DoXARkvZiUFp/m4wxp9wHZOF69STlxS9Z9K9t6iAEP7U3+XflWcqvUumhUzg2zEk
tWHUdW9zEBQ8BBpK7bwo7KNNWQvH8BFOtHzSfn0mkpsbllIW8/BKno91sesgifUw
rV7mEjzwENI=
=mPfB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: