Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem
On 17-Jan-99, Phillip Deackes took time to write :
>> so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz should have 700Bogomips isn't it ?
>
> I think I would be concerned too. I have an AMD K6-2 3D 350 MHz
I am !
> processor, overclocked to 400MHz and I get the following from cat
> /proc/cpuinfo:
>
> processor : 0
> cpu : 586
> model : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> stepping : A
> fdiv_bug : no
> hlt_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid : yes
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 syscr mmx 3dnow
> bogomips : 801.18
i have :
processor : 0
cpu : 586
model : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
stepping : M <---- difference !!! what is it ?
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid : yes
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 syscr pge mmx 3dnow
^^^ difference !
what's that ?
bogomips : 350.62
i will try to read the kernel sources if i understand anything...
but i someone knows about these things...
> Sorry if I state the obvious, but you are running at 3.5 x 100 MHz? You
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
i have to check tomorrow directly on the main board (is that what you think :
multiplier and bus frequency)
> do have 100 MHz memory?
i have two 64Mo chips 100MHz coming from different manufacturers (could that
be the cause ?)
will bogomips change if memory changes ?
> I have found in the past on a couple of occasions I have had ludicrously
> low bogomips figures and have re-compiled the kernel (not even changing
> the settings!) and the rate has gone up the next time i have re-booted.
> Only ever happened with a RedHat system - don't know why.
isn't that strange ?
bogomips should only depend on hardware no ?
> What kernel are you using? There are a couple of AMD K6-2 patches
> around.
2.0.36 without any patch i can think of.
otherwise the 'compile as [386/486/Pentium/PentiumPro]' option in kernel
compilation could change the bogomips rating or not ?
i compiled it as a 686.
should i compile it as a 586 ?
Patrick
Reply to: