Re: why .deb?
On 6 Jan 1999, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "MH" == Marc Haber <Marc.Haber-lists@gmx.de> writes:
>[snip]
> Bruce once suggested a move to rpm, but the developers believe dpkg is
> the better system.
You may be right; however, if my memory serves, Bruce suggested that
either .deb and .rpm be merged or that Red Hat adopt the .deb packaging
system outright, rather than the reverse.
At any rate, we agree, "Debian Rules!"
--David Teague dbt@elentari.cs.wcu.edu
Debian GNU/Linux: Because I want to be there TODAY. (stolen .sig)
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why .deb?
- From: martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de (Martin Bialasinski)
- References:
- Re: why .deb?
- From: martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de (Martin Bialasinski)