[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sb 32 PnP



Hi,
	From your /dev/sndstat, your midi device is working! Is this
because of the new kernel, or you did some tricks with isapnp tools??

	Thanks in advance. 

	PS. I can never get my midi device working under 2.0.35

Shao.


On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Richard Black wrote:

> Hi 
> 
> I have got my sound card (a soundblaster 32 PnP) up and running (with
> the 2.1.125 kernal).  Is there a way to check whether the card is just
> running like a sb16 (if indeed this is a meaningful question) os as a
> sb32?  My /dev/sndstat is below. 
> 
> thanks in advance
> 
> Richard
> 
> e: Driver loaded as a module
> Kernel: Linux beast 2.1.125 #1 Sun Nov 29 03:10:44 EST 1998 i586
> Config options: 0
> 
> Installed drivers: 
> 
> Card config: 
> 
> Audio devices:
> 0: Sound Blaster 16 (4.13)
> 
> Synth devices:
> 0: Yamaha OPL3
> 
> Midi devices:
> 0: Sound Blaster 16
> 
> Timers:
> 0: System clock
> 
> Mixers:
> 0: Sound Blaster
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Shao Zhang                             \\/
5/28-30 Victoria AVE                   OxO
PENSHURST 2035                         //\
Sydney, NSW                           ///\\
Australia                            ////\\\
                                    / ^   _ \
                                   ( (o) (o) )
****  *   *           *=======oOOO=====(_)=====OOOo=========*
   *  *  *            |      s2193893@cse.unsw.edu.au       |
****  * *             |       http://shaoz.dyn.ml.org       |
*   *******           | http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~s2193893|
****  * *             *===================Oooo.=============*
   *  *  *                        .oooO   (   |
 * *  * * *                        (   )   ) /
   *  *    *                        \ (   (_/
                                     \_)
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   


Reply to: